Pages

Wednesday, 4 January 2012

Why I Believe in the Resurrection.





























As I was drifting off to sleep last night, I murmured, “I believe in the resurrection.”

Roy woken up, said, amused, “I am glad to hear it!”
* * *

I was thinking of this passage I had recently read in Diarmaid MacCulloch’s magisterial, A History of Christianity.

Christianity is, at root, a personality cult. Its central message is the story of a person, Jesus, whom Christians believe is the Christ (from a Greek word, meaning Anointed One): the God who was, is and ever shall be, yet who is at the same time a human being, set in historic time. Christians believe that they can still meet this human being in a fashion comparable to the experience of the disciples who walked with him in Galilee, and saw him die on the cross. They are convinced that this meeting transforms lives—as has been evident in the experiences of other Christians across the centuries.

For me, that’s the ultimate proof of the resurrection—that Jesus is as real to me as anyone I know. Realer, perhaps, because I feel I know him better than many people I know.

* * *

The pastor of my old church, Williamsburg Community Chapel, Virginia, Bill Warrick, describes how he asked a Young Life mentee, “If you could speak to Jesus, and be answered, would you believe?” The young man answered (and this was the American South), “Oh yes, Sir, that would be the ultimate extraterrestrial experience!”

Indeed, prayer, asking Jesus how to do things--whether it’s thorny home-managing things, or business stuff, or writing, or blogging, or even Twitter!!—and receiving surprising and brilliant answers is the ultimate extra-terrestrial experience.
* * *

American Bible teacher, Beth Moore, says she was asked, “How do you know that Christ is real?” She answered, “If he wasn’t, then I must be crazy, because I talk to him all the time, and he answers.”  

It’s one proof, to me, that Christ is real and alive. I feel I can ask him questions, and get an answer. I can ask him how to do things, or what to do, and clarity comes, and, often, insight and a Gordian-knot-cutting to the heart of the problem, that comes from beyond myself, from way beyond my radar, my intelligence, or the way I normally think.

Of course, if researchers track creative people who meditate, they might come across similar answers surfacing from the unconscious. Whole mathematical careers, for instance, Ramanujan’s, have been built on these heuristic insights. (Interestingly, Ramanujan claimed he received his mathematical insights while absorbed in prayer and meditation).

What is more amazing, perhaps, is when prayer changes things outside yourself—other people’s hearts, external events, accelerates a career, when co-incidences accumulate when one prays, Berlin walls topple, glasnost occurs, in our lives and in the world.
* * *

Ultimately, I believe in the resurrection because to me Christ is so real that I can often see him with the eyes of faith. Because, on request, he can turn my moods around, and fill my heart with joy.

Because he answers my prayers, in the micro level of my mind, heart and spirit, and in the macro-level by orchestrating and bringing about events which I am powerless to do anything about
* * *

John’s proof of the reality of Jesus was that he had seen him: 1 John 1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched—this we proclaim concerning the Word of life. The life appeared; we have seen it and testify to it,

I believe in the resurrection because I have experienced him, and he has changed the deep structure of my mind, heart and spirit on a molecular level, as he changed water to wine, fed 5000 with 5 loaves, made water as solid as earth and walked on it, and resurrected the dead body of Lazarus—and then his own.




10 comments:

  1. Amen and Amen!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Happy New Year Anita!

    I like your explanation of why you believe in the Resurrection, it rings so true!
    But can I suggest that other people might also feel a very close contact with the Divine, only they might not call it "Jesus" but "God" or "The Spirit"?
    The experience would be as strong and as real and as life-changing but they might not see it as evidence of the Resurrection.

    Ultimately, what counts is not what we believe but how that belief changes us, what people it helps us to become - regardless of the intellectual framework we apply.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Ultimately, what counts is not what we believe but how that belief changes us, what people it helps us to become" I couldn't disagree more! You're right in as much as the world would be a wonderful place to live if everyone believed it was right and spiritual do to good works and be kind to one another, but our eternal destiny is secured by a belief in Jesus' death and resurection, therefore it is of essential importance what we believe!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Naomi,
    the belief that our ultimate destiny should be the main motivator for our faith is increasingly troubling me very deeply. It makes it a very selfish religion - I believe so that I am saved.
    I think Jesus showed us comprehensively that it's not actually about "us" but about "others". A genuine Christian life is about how we relate to other people, not about our own salvation. That may be a happy by-product but if it's our sole motivator we've gone badly wrong.

    I don't disbelieve the Resurrection, but I was commenting that a sense of being in touch with the Divine is no proof of it.
    Jesus left us saying that he would send us a Paraclete, a Comforter. He did not say that he, himself, would be in touch with us again until his Second Coming.
    Now, I accept that many Christians believe they have a personal relationship with Christ.
    But it is just as possible to believe that our contact point with the Trinity is the Holy Spirit.

    And our salvation really does not depend on getting this right, intellectually.
    As long as we hold on to the guidance we receive, we will be fine.
    By their fruits shall you tell them, not by their theology.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Erika, "Ultimately, what counts is not what we believe but how that belief changes us, what people it helps us to become." Ultimately what counts to whom? God surely is interested in us believing what is true. It is important to me that I believe what is true.
    Change cannot be taken as an evidence of faith--or the lack of it. For one, change takes place at different rates--glacial in some cases, rapid as a tsunami, for others. Also, as it says in Scripture, "What is highly valued among men might be detestable in God's sight." (Luke 16:15) For instance, tolerance for what God might consider less than perfect may be highly valued among men, but not by God.
    "A genuine Christian life" is about our relationship to Christ, in my opinion. How we relate to others is "a happy by-product."
    Thanks for commenting, Erika, Naomi and Mary

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anita,
    the question is how do we know what is true and how much does it matter if we get it wrong?

    If you believe that we have a personal relationship with Christ and I believe that I experience the Holy Spirit - is that really such a massive deal that one of us absolutely has to be right? To what - to be saved? To be right with God?
    And how would we know who was right?


    We strive to discover God's truth and we strive to live accordingly.
    But we don't face an exam where we must absolutely get every bit of theology right in order to pass.

    ReplyDelete
  7. " genuine Christian life" is about our relationship to Christ, in my opinion"

    I agree - but the fruits of that, the evidence for that, is to be found in how we relate to other people. It's not to be found in the minutiae of theological belief.

    There are millions of people of all faiths who will kill in order to impose what they see as right belief. And they genuinely think that this puts them right with God.
    And Roman Catholics will dismiss all Protestant heretics and consign them to hell, and Evangelicals will dismiss all liberals and consign them to hell -and so we create hell on earth. And people somewhere still argue passionately about the filioque clause. And believe their salvation depends on it.

    I completely disagree with this emphasis of the truth we supposedly know. The only way of telling if someone is a genuine Christian is by looking at how they live, how loving, how compassionate they are. How they deal with those they disagree with, how much humility they show, how much understanding of their own lack of knowledge.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Erika , you say, "The only way of telling if someone is a genuine Christian is by looking at how they live, how loving, how compassionate they are. How they deal with those they disagree with, how much humility they show, how much understanding of their own lack of knowledge."

    I agree that the acid test is love, but as Paul does in 1 Cor. 13, we are to use that to judge ourselves, not other people. If we use it too harshly for other people, we land up in the unfortunate position in which we decide that those who are not loving or compassion enough to us, or who don't show humility in their disagreements with are not Christians. It's always best to leave the decision of who is a genuine Christian and who isn't up to Christ himself, say I, somewhat magisterially!!

    But, we are straying too far off topic from my post which detailed a subjective, personal reason I believe in the Resurrection :-)
    Blessings, Anita

    ReplyDelete
  9. And I did very much like this post!!
    Blessings to you too :-)

    ReplyDelete
  10. I love Beth Moore's quote. I guess I must be crazy too if Jesus is not real :) You're beginning paragraph made me laugh! Thank you for linking up :)

    ReplyDelete

Hi guys, love hearing from you, so fire away! Word verification and comment moderation has been experimentally turned off!