As I was writing on the cosmic significance of the Cross of Christ, I realised that though I was born Catholic and remained Catholic until I was 21 and was, at times, a serious Catholic--even a novice in Mother Teresa's Convent for 14 months--I had never really understood exactly why Jesus had to die.
If I committed a mortal sin, I would go to hell--if I had not had
the chance to go to confession and be absolved before I died (Do you see how
this strengthens the power of the priesthood?) If I only committed venial sins,
I would go to Purgatory, and then after a period there, shortened if people
prayed or paid, offering Masses on my behalf, I would go to heaven. Just as if
Jesus had not died?
And when--after a six year period in my twenties of not really
believing anything very much--I decided to recommit to following Christ, I went
to serious Bible-believing Protestant churches.
And when the Atonement was first explained to me, I am afraid I
did not really believe it. Why? Because it could not really be proven.
Just as I had not really believed in heaven and hell for those six
years, because, for all I knew they were theological inventions, theological
fairy tales. I remember saying that I would not do anything for desire for
heaven or fear of hell, because there was no proof for either of these.
* * *
I came back to faith because my life was not working successfully
or elegantly, and I thought I had made rather a mess of it. Surely I would do
better if I followed Christ, I thought.
But, in Oxford, I had listened to lectures on Lord Raglan’s The Hero and was struck at the resemblances the life of Jesus bore to
these mythical heroes across cultures.
1. Hero's mother is a royal
virgin;
2. His father is a king, and
3 4. The circumstances of his conception are unusual, and
5. He is also reputed to be the son of a god.
6. At birth an attempt is made, to kill him, but
7. he is spirited away, and
8. Reared by foster -parents in a far country.
9. We are told nothing of his childhood, but
10. On reaching manhood he returns or goes to his future Kingdom.
14. For a time he reigns uneventfully and
15. Prescribes laws, but
16. Later he loses favour with the gods and/or his subjects, and
17. Is driven from the throne and city, after which
18. He meets with a mysterious death,
19. Often at the top of a hill,
20. His children, if any do not succeed him.
21. His body is not buried, but nevertheless
22. He has one or more holy sepulchres.
2. His father is a king, and
3 4. The circumstances of his conception are unusual, and
5. He is also reputed to be the son of a god.
6. At birth an attempt is made, to kill him, but
7. he is spirited away, and
8. Reared by foster -parents in a far country.
9. We are told nothing of his childhood, but
10. On reaching manhood he returns or goes to his future Kingdom.
14. For a time he reigns uneventfully and
15. Prescribes laws, but
16. Later he loses favour with the gods and/or his subjects, and
17. Is driven from the throne and city, after which
18. He meets with a mysterious death,
19. Often at the top of a hill,
20. His children, if any do not succeed him.
21. His body is not buried, but nevertheless
22. He has one or more holy sepulchres.
Numerous heroes fit into
this archetype, including Krishna, Moses, Romulus, King Arthur, Perseus,
Heracles, Mohammed, Beowulf, Buddha, Zeus, Samson, Achilles, and Odysseus.
And so I wondered: Was Jesus God? Was there a God?
* * *
When C.S. Lewis was troubled by the same thing, in Oxford, 45 year
earlier, Tolkein sorted him out by explaining that Christianity is simply a true myth: a myth working on us in the same way as the
others, but with this tremendous difference that it really happened:
My puzzle was about the
whole doctrine of Redemption: in what sense the life and death of Christ
“saved” or “opened salvation to” the world. I could see how miraculous salvation
might be necessary. What I couldn’t see was how the life and death of Someone
Else (whoever he was) two thousand years ago could help us here and now —
except in so far as his example helped us.
And the example
business, tho’ true and important, is not Christianity: right in the centre of
Christianity, in the Gospels and St Paul, you keep on getting something quite
different and very mysterious expressed in those phrases I have so often
ridiculed (“propitiation” — “sacrifice” — “the blood of the Lamb”) —
expressions wh. I cd only interpret in senses that seemed to me either silly or
shocking.
Now what Dyson and Tolkien showed me was this: that if I met
the idea of sacrifice in a Pagan story I didn’t mind it at all: again, that if
I met the idea of a God sacrificing himself to himself, I liked it very much
and was mysteriously moved by it. Again,
the idea of the dying and reviving god (Balder, Adonis, Bacchus) similarly
moved me, provided I met it anywhere except in the Gospels. The
reason was that in Pagan stories I was prepared to feel the myth as profound
and suggestive of meanings beyond my grasp even tho’ I could not say in cold
prose “what it meant.”
Now the story of Christ is simply a true myth: a myth
working on us in the same way as the others, but with this tremendous
difference that it really happened: and one must be content to accept it in the
same way, remembering that it is God’s myth where the others are men’s myths:
i.e. the Pagan stories are God expressing Himself through the minds of poets,
using such images as He found there, while Christianity is God expressing
Himself through what we call “real things”. Therefore it is true, not in the
sense of being a “description” of God (that no finite mind could take in) but
in the sense of being the way in which God chooses to (or can) appear to our
faculties.
The “doctrines” we
get out of the true myth are translations into our concepts and ideas of
that wh. God has already expressed in a language more adequate, namely the
actual incarnation, crucifixion, and resurrection. At any rate I am now certain (a) That this
Christian story is to be approached, in a sense, as I approached the other
myths. (b) That it is the most important and full of meaning. I am also certain
that it really happened…
I then had no Tolkein to sort me out!
* * *
When I longed for faith again a North Star to guide, when, you
might say, I missed Jesus, a friend, Peggy
Goetz, suggested I try to do what Jesus said, and see
if it was true or not.
“If anyone chooses to do God's
will, he will find out whether my teaching comes from God or whether I speak on
my own,” John
7:17 was Jesus’s own apologetic, the proof he offered of whether his words were
from God, or his own.
So I started giving to everyone who asked of me, lending and not
asking back, praying and keeping a list of my prayer requests. And there was a
tidal wave of answers, sweeping me into the Kingdom. Little odd things: I had
just moved into an unfurnished house for my Ph.D and realized I’d need to buy a
mattress. What a hassle without a car! I prayed I’d be given one, and a student
returning to Korea offered me hers the next day. Several coincidences like
that! Wow!
And
so, real faith slowly slipped into place like pieces in a particularly
difficult jigsaw.
* * *
Does anyone become a Christian and then instantly believe all its
doctrines? Or do they fall into place, step by step as they did for me? Do we construct our creeds gradually. Yeah, I
believe in the Resurrection. Yes, I
believe in the Atonement. Yeah, I believe
in Hell, because Jesus talked so much about it, though I am uncertain of its
demographics. Yeah, I believe in Heaven--ditto!!
I believe!
Thanks so much for this. I converted to Jesus at age 23, fell out from the Protestants, made my way through the Roman Catholic and Greek Orthodox churches and now find myself agnostic and barely Christian any longer. I've tried to convince myself out of a faith that used to "work" as yours did; pray and it was sometimes answered, sometimes not and faith in all of it. I don't know where I fell away; college perhaps? But I do know that I've never quite given up on Jesus. Thank you for the C. S. Lewis quotes. It answers many questions I too had studying literature and myth at university. I'd like to get all that back.
ReplyDeleteThanks again!
Thanks, Pilgrim. I am afraid there is no real point to this piece. I was just sharing a little fragment of my journey.
ReplyDeleteYes, "Ask and you shall sometimes receive" is truer to people's experience. On the other hand, "Do not ask, and you shall not receive is also true." And if we received everything we asked for, what a mess we and our lives would be!!
In the end, I think Jesus is sublime and luminious, and it's worth doing what he tells us to, even if we aren't sure he's God. Then we find ourselves amazed by his wisdom and insight, and conclude he must be more than human.
At any rate, I think a life with Jesus in it, is sweeter and wiser whether we are convinced he is God or not.
I like this tale of Chuck Templeton, Billy Graham's more gifted preaching partner, and how he burst into tears, saying he missed Jesus at the end of his life. http://dreamingbeneaththespires.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/tale-of-two-evangelists-belief-in.html
Blessings, Anita
Hi Anita
ReplyDeleteIt seems that we can know in part , that is what is achieved by searching in the same direction without Christ ; half truths become myths and legends but the heart still hungers for the complete story.
In Christ and with Him all the pieces of the puzzle become complete the whole picture is revealed in the truth of His Being; God incarnate;
Here is the purpose of God lived out through Jesus. John 4:4-26
Lovely DJV! Yes, indeed the jigsaw puzzle of life gets sorted out and makes sense in Christ. It's an ongoing process for me, but a joyful one!
ReplyDelete